Share

School: signed the agreement, the mobility starts

The agreement will change the rules for assigning the definitive location for newly hired teachers in phase B and C - The "territorial areas" are underway - Goodbye to the rankings: the teachers will be chosen directly by the principals, for whom, however, it is a half revolution.

The Ministry of Education and the trade unions have signed, at the end of a long and exhausting negotiation, the mobility contract envisaged by the #Good school, which will change the rules for moving teachers from school and will officially start the territorial areas and the "direct" call of the principals.

The negotiation, as mentioned, was extremely tiring and the Gilda of the teachers did not sign the contract, which was signed, however, by the representatives of CISL and UIL school, FLC Cgil and Snals.

The rules for assigning the permanent location for newly hired professors in phase B and C and for those who request a transfer from one province to another will change. Even if, from this point of view, the 250 applications estimated by the Uil for the first extraordinary mobility after the approval of the Buona Scuola are too many to be accepted.

The new rules on mobility provide that the teacher who wants to change institution must no longer indicate an institution, but a territorial scope which includes several institutions, of all school levels and, possibly, of all high school addresses. The call, within these areas, will in any case fall to the principals-mayors.

Precisely for the principals, however, the agreement marks a half revolution, compared to the initial intentions of the #Good school, given that the teacher's move will be subject to his consent, and also in the light of the fact that those who were hired prior to phase B and C will be able to continue to apply for the destination schools, at least for the next two years.

The break with the Guild arrived precisely on transfers by territorial area: "Our refusal to sign the agreement - explains Rino Di Meglio - is consistent with the fight carried out from the beginning against law 107 and its pillars represented by areas territorial and direct call without any kind of ranking and objective criteria".

Obviously, the vision of the signatory unions is different, according to which this contract “allows to remedy many of the critical issues and inequalities that the law itself has caused. The negotiation, although not being able to fully solve all the problems induced by the 107, has made it possible to obtain important results".

comments