100 quota is now at the end of the line, but what will come next? So far, the only certainty is that on 31 December 2021 the measure strongly desired by the League in the yellow-green government (which allows you to retire at 62 years of age and 38 of contributions) will expire and will not be renewed. From 2022 January XNUMX, therefore, you cannot retire before you have completed 67 years. A heavy and unpopular staircase, linked to the Fornero law, which the government will probably try to lighten by introducing new forms of outgoing flexibility. For this reason, the battle over pensions will probably be one of the most heated in the political debate in the autumn, when the new budget maneuver begins to be written. Of ideas, however, more than one is already circulating.
The best known (and most articulated) is that of the trade unions. CGIL, CISL and UIL would like to exceed the 100 mark with a new mechanism flexible exit from the age of 62, which is accompanied by the possibility of leaving work with 41 years of contributions regardless of age. These are the two cornerstones of a package of proposals which also provides for social security interventions for young people and for workers employed in strenuous tasks, as well as measures to restore the purchasing power of pensions.
Even the technicians of the Ministry of Economy they would be thinking about a fast track for i tiring jobs: the hypothesis would be to retire a 61 years and 7 months, with at least 35 contributions, pending workers, while the self-employed would be required one more year. To this measure would be added a structural version of Woman option (at least 58 years of age and 35 of contributions, with the entire pension calculated with the contributory method) and theSocial bee for workers in difficulty (long-term unemployed and disabled) who are at least 63 years old.
With unprecedented support for the trade unions, the League – through the Undersecretary for the Economy, Claudio Durigon – proposes one Odds 41 for everyone. The Pd, however, through the mouth of Graziano Delrio, had launched the proposal to exit with 92 quota (62 years of age plus 30 of contributions) only for workers engaged in strenuous tasks.
A fourth option is inherited from the Conte bis government and is especially liked by the Movement 5 Stars. It would be a question of introducing a sort of from 2022 102 quota, allowing the exit from the job with 63 years of age and 39 of contributions or 64 of age and 38 of contributions. Finally, the president of INPS, Pasquale Tridico, proposed to allow those aged 62-63 to leave work with the contribution part, while the salary part would be obtained upon reaching 67 years of age. Tridico also spoke of the possibility of providing an additional slide to the social Ape for the oncological immunosuppressed aged 62-63. We are at the beginning of a path on which Prime Minister Mario Draghi will certainly have his say.
I have thirty-one contributions but I will have to retire at 67 and 9 months. No one thinks for those who start working late.
We will be the new poor despite having worked all our lives. We will leave a serious welfare burden to those who will have to take care of those who cannot afford a visit to the dentist, an ECG. But from my b.paga they have taken the contributions in these 34 years but they don't want to return them. Is it justice?
Started black at 14 2/5, 62 sons last 34 years treated mum with Alzheimer's. Nothing pre/after school. Woman 900 years old XNUMX contributions. EXEMPT MILITARY this they asked for!!! What rights?? Women's pension XNUMX euros after all that has been done? But where is who should protect those who work and the weakest categories? Other than basic income
Surely, after so many sacrifices, it will be a starvation pension… THINK OF CREATING NEW JOBS FOR OUR YOUNG PEOPLE. When we parents are gone who will help them?
Resign yourselves.. they'll give it to us post mortem
I say no well if we continue like this when will we leave room for young people to work? when we should go on as long as we wear trousers, even if young people run away from here for the reason we know but we want to make those few work or not!! I started at 14 and I'm 57 and I still have to work because it continues always changing!!
From 2022 January 41, it will also continue to retire with the contributory seniority requirements. 10 years and 67 months for women, one year longer for men. Do not write inaccuracies. 67 years old. But come on. At 20 you go for old age with XNUMX years of contributions.
For old age we go with 67 years of age (but if they don't remove the expectations it will increase) and MINIMUM 20 years of contributions. Therefore if for example you have 40 years of contributions and you no longer work (perhaps because you lost your job and who hires you at a certain age?) ) you still have to wait for 67 years of age.
Consider the possibility of retiring disabled civilians, with any contributions paid, at the age of 62, give the possibility of helping young people to enter the world of work, I appeal to the unions to carry on this unfortunate negotiation, disabling pathologies do not improve in time... So come on what you have to do...
With the contributory system, whatever happens, it will be a HUNGER pension!!
Right starvation pensions with the contributory system
yes and no you have to see how much one paid
I have 42 years of contributions and 59 of age for us no prospects .........
With 42 years and 10 months of contributions you retire. These inaccurate articles that fire a thousand hypotheses, different every day, should be banned.
why, does the article perhaps say that with 42 years and 10 months of contributions you don't retire?
Hang in there, you're done in ten months.
And what about those who started working at 15 and are in line waiting for retirement with 41 years of contributions and see themselves overtaken by those who have 38? IS THIS JUSTICE?
For the unemployed?
For those people who started working for 15 years and now have 39 years of contributions with a registered age of 55, does anyone think about it?
In 3 years and 10 months you retire. Exactly with 42 years and ten months. Unless you can go with 41 years of contributions, being an early worker. Provided you meet one of the other requirements.
lucky them, there are those who go to 67 and ……
As always, the precocious suffer it all thanks to justice
I've never understood precocious ones. If one started working continuously at 15 he retires at 57 aa and 10 mm (young people) if one started at 20 (perhaps because he studied) he retires at 62 aa and 10 mm and so on. But why would those who already come out earlier (rightly) want to come out even earlier? I will never understand
I'd be totally fine with retiring at 61, even paying off a 4-year mortgage. Giving way to a young boy who would definitely outperform me in the job.