Share

Ddl Capitali, Assonime dots the "i"s and warns: it is not up to the minorities but to the board to vote for the candidates on the list

Minorities will not be able to have more than 20% of the seats on future boards of directors: this is what Assonime claims by interpreting the rules of the new Capital Bill in a way that respects equal treatment among shareholders

Ddl Capitali, Assonime dots the "i"s and warns: it is not up to the minorities but to the board to vote for the candidates on the list

Easy on the imaginative interpretations of the Capital bill: it is not up to the minorities to vote for the individual candidates on the list of the outgoing Board of Directors but to the board itself. To clarify this is theAssonymous, the association of spas which, with a circular, intervenes on hot spots (list of the Board of Directors in first of all) of the controversial Capital Bill, just approved by Parliament but possible revisitations from the new Tuff of the Government. The new governance, Assonime essentially claims, cannot become the dictatorship of minorities. and, in fact, in addition to providing a rational discipline on the voting of individual nominations, Assonime maintains that the overall weight of minorities on the board of directors of a company cannot go beyond 20% ceiling and cannot be based on the criterion of absolute proportionality which would end up invalidating the principle of equal treatment of the members themselves.

comments