On the attack USA-Israel atIran “Referring to international law is right but it must not be an alibi to ignore the underlying problems” he claims Riccardo Perissich, essayist, international relations scholar and former senior official of the European Commission, in one of the most lucid analyses of the international events of the last few hours that led to the killing of the Iranian Supreme Leader KhameneiAccording to Perissich, "there are two distinct issues here. The first: Iran must not have the weapon nuclear. Period. Better through negotiation, with force if necessary. Europe has always favored negotiation, but has no doubts about the objective. This explains the caution of the European reaction. I have no basis for evaluating the Israeli-American claim that Iran was close to procuring it. Many experts agree, and if that's the case, intervention is justified.
“Then – adds Perissich – there is the second question, regime changeThe only perspective compatible with the MAGA doctrine and common sense would be a “Venezuelan” perspective“That is, parts of the regime willing to collaborate. Anything is possible, but highly questionable. The risk in the end is an earthquake in the Middle East or a new Iraq. Stefano Silvestri is right when he claims that too many objectives compromise the mission". "To all this - concludes Perissich - is added the probable violation of the constitutional norms. Everyone is wondering how long the Republican members of the Congress “will they accept” Trump’s moves. Good question.
