Share

Pensions, sting of M5S and Lega on professionals and managers

The drastic cut of 10 or 20% of pensions above 4 euros per month conceived by the Five Star Movement and the League undermines the acquired rights of the middle class and, being concentrated on a small audience, risks not raising the resources necessary to raise minimum pensions and social unleashing protests and endless appeals that will end up before the Constitutional Court

Pensions, sting of M5S and Lega on professionals and managers

Other than abolishing the Fornero reform or recalculating pensions with the contributory method. The recipe packaged by the bill presented to the Chamber by the group leaders of the Five Star Movement, Francesco D'Uva, and of the League, Riccardo Molinari, will give middle-class pensioners a much, much more severe blow than the Fornero reform envisaged.

Lega and Cinque Stelle are determined to cut pensions above 10 euros net per month (20 euros gross per year) from 4 to 80% with a modulated intervention in proportion to the earlier retirement with respect to an age defined a posteriori and which, by retroactively affecting acquired rights, is destined to create growing inequalities and discontent and to raise a shower of protests and appeals which, as judge Gian Carlo Caselli claims, will most likely end up before the Constitutional Court.

The objective of the maneuver is to find the resources to raise the minimum and social pensions but, as has already happened with the Di Maio Decree on work, the clumsy and demagogic way in which the intervention on middle class pensions has been thought risks turning into a boomerang. For two reasons. Firstly because, focusing on a relatively small number of pensioners (158 pensioners in all), it risks being very heavy and being disavowed by the Consulta as discriminatory and retroactive and secondly because the resources that the cut will ensure will hardly arrive to the 500 million a year which is the minimum necessary to raise the minimum and social pensions.

The populist Robin Hood-like logic with which Lega and Cinque Stelle are preparing to cut middle-class pensions, not only for the future but from 2019 January XNUMX onwards, also appears to be completely unrelated to a project for the overall reorganization of pensions but above all it risks creating a precedent which, by harming acquired rights without too much concern, can only alarm all pensioners and not just those in the categories that are targeted. What is certain is that, in addition to the medium-high pensions of public managers, the intervention of the League and the Five Stars will also affect the private social security funds of doctors, engineers, architects, accountants and other professional categories , such as journalists, industrial experts, psychologists and so on.

The most penalized will be those who retired from work before the age of 60 but, according to an initial survey, it will be mainly women, policemen and soldiers who will suffer if the Lega and M5S, overwhelmed by protests and protests from the middle class, they will not stop in time and will not understand that they have taken a very high-risk road that can have social and electoral repercussions that perhaps the Northern League and the grillini have not yet fully considered. Sooner or later someone will also ask Lega and Cinque Stelle why, instead of hitting the acquired rights of pensioners, they don't think of cutting the rich golden salaries of their parliamentarians.

4 thoughts on "Pensions, sting of M5S and Lega on professionals and managers"

  1. The journalist is right, this Lega bill - 5 Stars does not rebalance pensions and contributions paid but only makes a low butchery by cutting the pensions of those who quit before the age of 67 without looking at the amount of contributions paid - Who squawks a lot against pensions also think that this law, if it passes, will give governments a weapon, which will be able to draw resources from our pensions at will. Today they start from 3700 euros net (false when they say 4000) upwards and tomorrow, if needed, maybe they will interest the lower ones. Last points I agree on solidarity to help the weakest but as the constitution says everyone must contribute according to their possibilities, therefore not only pensioners but .. everyone, this bill does not take into consideration the family pension income but that of the individual without seeing the family burdens (another injustice)

    Reply
  2. Logically, the newsagent who writes falsehoods never signs himself!!!
    THIS IS THE TRUTH, it is the fact that there are dizzying pensions, not justified by the contributions paid, when millions of Italians, who have worked hard a whole life, are forced to survive with indignified figures, THE NEW LAW WILL MAKE PAY FOR HOW MUCH YOU POURED!!!
    NEWSPAPER LECCHINO AT LEAST SIGNED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  3. Excellent article that says nothing, or rather says that maybe, well, if, who knows… etcetera. I saw it through the MSN home page that opens when I turn on my pc. I confirm, excellent article but only to get a few clicks. I'm going to change my home page from MSN to Google…

    Reply

comments