"None assets, we already have it on real estate and it's called Imu. I think there should be greater progressivity on this one, but as far as the rest of the estates are concerned, I don't intend to conceive a patrimonial one at all. I think our problem is traceability”. The fiscal reassurance comes directly from the secretary of the Democratic Party, Pier Luigi Bersani, interviewed today by Radio 24.
The number one of the Democratic Party also cuts short on the possibility of a new one pardon"Never again. We work for fiscal loyalty, so that every euro raised can reduce taxes for those who pay them. If we never start, we'll never get out."
Bersani then replies to Silvio Berlusconi, who has placed the issue of taxes at the center of the electoral campaign. “There is a tax problem – underlines the democratic secretary – and I remember that Berlusconi talks about cuts immediately, but with him the tax burden has increased by four points and is now very heavy. We need to support businesses, the labor quota on Irap must be reduced and stabilized. It is necessary to move the economy a little to get consumption back on track”.
You won't need a new "corrective maneuver – clarifies Bersani -, but be careful to make botched reasoning or to tell that we are in order. We have come off the precipice but there are still problems. We must not make promises in vain”.
As for large state-controlled companies, in particular Finmeccanica, according to Bersani “there hasn't been enough attention. I cannot remain silent about some critical element that occurred this year. Finmeccanica deserved special attention from the Government and Parliament, in the right forms. We are talking about a large public company, which manages a leading technological frontier for our country. I remember that when it happened to me, even in a difficult phase of restructuring of that company, things were conducted with a Government that spoke with the company, with a Parliamentary Commission that seriously discussed this thing and with decisions entrusted, of course, to the manager but according to a shareholder address”.
In short, according to the secretary of the Pd, “the shareholder has to say something. If we start from the assumption that the shareholder, being public, doesn't have to say anything, it doesn't make sense, it doesn't stand. He ends up having companies that do not have enough bar ”.
