Share

Banks, even the Fed discovers the value of proximity

The Banca Popolare di Bari crisis has rekindled discussions on the role of local banks, but it is not possible to lump everything together and the afterthought that comes from the USA and which hypothesizes a new banking paradigm makes us think

Banks, even the Fed discovers the value of proximity

Before the holiday seasonRandal K. Quarles, vice chairman of oversight at the Federal Reserve gave a speech at Stanford University, the prestigious University of California. In perspective, his speech focused on what currently appears to be the evolution of the economy, especially as regards movement of people, job opportunities and concentration in urban centres.

One of the salient points of the speech given by Quarles concerned the evolution of the economy and society in the western United States, emphasizing, in particular, that after decades in which there has been a progressive and homogeneous depopulation of the so-called rural areas towards the big cities, in recent years, on the contrary, an opposite trend has been reinforcing which sees small towns flourish again with a recovery of the growth of the resident population. This is a trend which, according to Quarles, should lead us to reflect on how the banking system should be imagined and designed in the next few years to guarantee again that proximity which the renewed vitality of some areas far from the big cities needs again today.

The crisis that has occurred since 2007 has brought profound changes in the US banking system favoring the succession of a series of mergers and acquisitions in order to save the banks most in difficulty. This has clearly produced a reduction in the number of banks and the number of branchesespecially in small towns. But today, precisely this new greater vitality of small towns necessarily requires, according to Quarles, a new framework of thought which contemplates, together with the advantages offered by technology and fintech innovations, a physical presence that allows us to offer even more services to customers, some of which cannot be delivered through digital channels.

What is relevant of the considerations expressed by Quarles concerns the beginning of a rethinking of the vision that has guided the Fed thus far in the evolution of the US banking system, a vision that has favored the affirmation of increasingly large banking groups, stressing efficiency and profitability objectives beyond all reasonable limits, often to the detriment of the possibility of providing services on a widespread basis. A return therefore to a new and more modern vision of proximity that is advocated by the Federal Reserve, with the aim of encouraging and accompanying development and economic growth even in those areas with a lower population density where the recovery seems increasingly take root and expand thanks also to the possibilities offered by technological evolution to decentralize work activities and without negative effects in terms of productivity.

A paradigm shift, therefore, the one that is appearing on the US economic and financial scene which seems to contrast with what is still promoted in Europe today where, in recent years, all the interventions of the European Central Bank have been aimed at safeguarding the stability of the banking and financial system through a process of consolidation which, here too, has seen reduce the number of banks and branches. A process that also accompanied itself increasingly stringent rules regarding capital requirements and items to be set aside to cope with the growth of problematic items present in the balance sheet and which has required the greatest sacrifices precisely from the smallest banks and those of the territory which base their work on lending mainly on financing the real economy.

It is hoped that the new vision that comes from the United States and the Federal Reserve will also be implemented by the ECB, given the conformation of the productive fabric in Europe where, together with numerous large companies, there are also millions of small and medium-sized enterprises which, in order to offer their contribution to the recovery of the economy, need to be able to communicate closely with established credit institutions on the territory and capable of offering compatible responses to their needs. Having the objective of safeguarding financial stability without taking into account the growth of the real economy risks being only a temporary and counterproductive illusion. 

comments